LOOM INTERLOCK PRINCIPLE

No single expression is presumed to exhaust the relation it expresses.

Where multiple expressions refer to the same constituted object or relation, their differences may be compared without requiring their collapse into a single form.

Each expression may expose structure that another leaves implicit, obscure, or differently resolved.

The expressions therefore operate not merely in parallel, but in interlock: each supplies distinctions against which the others may be examined.

Difference is not averaged away.
Difference is used to recover structure.

The object does not multiply because the cuts multiply.

One object. Several cuts. A more recoverable relation.

That last triplet is probably the compact form worth repeating throughout LOOM.

And there is a strong methodological consequence: interlock is not consensus. Five translations agreeing does not mechanically outvote a sixth. The sixth may be the one that exposes a distinction hidden by the other five. The purpose is not majority semantics; it is structural recovery through non-identical views.